![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimcUkuCS7t2JbJr9PXHVgSeyhtG7dmeLXpHvkbcidpCuRWhyphenhyphenZKe3LVy-kF6a8D0f0HcmrD3gxURdnOTOZj0hAmGk_OX6-IYqniRnTGQ0SpAErq2kW7UxSwc2CLJuar_8OwQJQtSZjwKBFC/s320/Invisible.jpg)
It’s still a “tricksy” novel though, but it’s not a full blown “Philip K Dickian” “mind-f**k”. There’s the usual blurring of boundaries – Adam Walker is a Columbia student (guess where Paul Auster went), Georges Perec gets a mention – no one reads airport thrillers in an Auster novel, and as you’d expect it abounds with references and allusions (I think!). I’m fairly sure I didn’t get one half of them but I’m convinced Rudolf Born bears more than a passing resemblance to Kurtz although, naturally, it’s the Marlon Brando reincarnation that features. Sadly I can’t mention any others without a spoiler warning (or maybe that’s my get out of jail card?)
So Although “Invisible” is firmly within the Auster fold it’s also his most readable to date. With previous novels it’s hard to avoid the feeling that they are read in the main by cognoscenti ticking off or nodding to each reference in smug satisfaction. It’s still an option here but more than any of his previous work it’s also possible to just sit back and enjoy the ride.
Shouldn't that be Georges Perec gets a mntion?!
ReplyDeleteGood spot and an ironic reference to "Lipogram". I am doubly damned!
ReplyDelete